Comparative Analysis: A Feasible Software Engineering Method

Authors

  • Nelly Maneva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55630/sjc.2007.1.1-12

Keywords:

Multiple Criteria, Decision Making, Quality Models, Software Metrics

Abstract

The reasonable choice is a critical success factor for decision- making in the field of software engineering (SE). A case-driven comparative analysis has been introduced and a procedure for its systematic application has been suggested. The paper describes how the proposed method can be built in a general framework for SE activities. Some examples of experimental versions of the framework are brie y presented.

References

Maneva N., Nikolova N. Team-work training for software people. Proc. of the 34 Spring conference of the UBM, Math. and Education in Math. 34 (2005), 243–250.

Raccoon L. B. S. The Chaos Model and the Chaos Life Cycle. Software Engineering Notes 20, No 1, (1995), 55–66.

Raccoon L. B. S. Fifty years of progress in SE. Software Engineering Notes 22, No 1 (1997), 88–104.

Sanders J., E. Curran. Software Quality. Addison–Wesley, 1994.

Wilber K. A Brief History of Everything. Shambhala Publ. Inc., 1996

Zelemy M. Multiple criteria decision making. McGrow-Hill Book Company, 1982

Zuse H. A Framework of Software Measurement. Walter de Gruyter&Co, Hawthorne, NY, USA, 1997

Downloads

Published

2007-03-19

Issue

Section

Articles